Take Better Photos: 7 Reasons to shoot Film

In Photo Basics by Michael Allen13 Comments

One of the most sought after results of time spent photographing is becoming a “better” photographer. What does that mean, though? How does one know if they are a better photographer than when they set out that afternoon? This article doesn’t cover those identifying markers, but rather examples of how image quality is dramatically improved when one makes a conscious decision to shoot film during at least some of their practice time.

1 — You slow down, physically (focusing, winding, changing film)

One of the biggest impediments to strong, or improving, image quality is rushing. You may not even realize you’re doing this, it’s built into so much of our contemporary culture – at least in the United States. We are trained from a young age to attempt to accomplish as much as we possibly can in as short of a time as we can; when we go out to create photography this tendency is replicated. Setting up a shot and triggering the shutter and then moving on once the back of our LCD screen looks exposed correctly.

With film, there is a necessary slowdown that occurs. We can no longer shoot in a burst mode, having to wind after every frame. If you go pure analog (which this author feels you should), you no longer have high speed ultrasonic focusing motors, having to focus manually for every image. And the limits! Film has a limited number of frames in each roll. No longer can you shoot thousands of images in a row with no concern for changing memory cards, having to change out your film roll every certain number of shots.

______________________________

Film requires the user to have a much more active role in the photographic act, causing a natural slowdown.

______________________________

2 — You slow down, mentally (You're using a limited commodity)

Ektar Color Film available on Amazon

An additional slowing down that is a byproduct of shooting film is your mental approach to the shooting. I believe this to be mostly a fiscal consideration, though that may not appear to be the proximal cause. Your film will run out. You’ll have to purchase more  (like this Ektar 100 film available on Amazon), wait for it to arrive, store it safely once it does, have a storage system for the negatives once they’re developed (most people have computers these days so storage for digital files doesn’t feel like an extra investment initially), and storage for any prints you decide to make or have made.

These costs will undoubtedly be in your head every time you go to take images, which means every time you capture a moment in time, you will want to make sure that you are capturing the moment as perfectly as you can. You'll be thinking through how many rolls you have remaining, how many images you think that will allow you to take, and if you think it will be enough. These types of thoughts are less common in today's digital age, because memory card sizes are so large that one rarely has to be concerned with having enough space for what they are trying to photograph.

3 — You learn to see contrast better (when you shoot in black and white)

I’m breaking these next two points into two separate ideas because I feel that shooting color versus black and white film challenge your perception in similar, yet distinct, ways.

When you’re shooting black and white film, you look at your final images and you see a gradient. Properly exposed AND properly developed images will have a range of values (a zone system, as Ansel Adams described) that travel from pure black to pure white. Because of this, you will start to recognize contrast in subjects and situations more consistently. You will begin looking through your viewfinder and determining whether you think there is too much, not enough, or just the right amount of contrast for what you are trying to accomplish. This then informs the development phase and how intense you want the contrast filter to be on your enlarger,  or how long you leave the print in certain chemicals.

4 — You learn to understand color better (when you shoot color film)

Related to point three, shooting and developing for a c-print (color print) will push the limits on how you interpret color in a scene. You’ll begin looking back on your images and recognizing what types of colors work well with particular types of film (or perhaps those that do not work well), as well as how those tones interact with each other.

Since you (generally) do not bring color film into a program such as Lightroom, Bridge, or Photoshop to work with color channels, you begin to develop a sense of how to interact with these colors in the world. Even if your final intent is to do some digital manipulation via scanning the negatives, you will never have the same amount of control due to the lack of data you have in a scan as opposed to in a digital file. This may become daunting for some, but it may also be liberating and challenging!

5 — You learn from mistakes more efficiently

This point, almost more than all the others, is going to be a spectrum based on your personality as well as your development workflow. If you are the one going through the development phase (whether in your own darkroom or one that you have access to), you will find yourself learning in much more acute ways when you make a mistake. When you have full control over the process from shoot to final print, you will always be more invested in the work. Because of this, you may look at a final image and wonder why it looks so terrible! Or, hopefully, why it looks so amazing!

You’ll spend a lot of time investigating your images as you see their final form. You’ll inevitably ask yourself how you can replicate that look, process, or interaction of light and camera. Unlike with digital files, we don’t have metadata to fall back on to view our settings. Because of this, you will find yourself keeping logs of your settings, bracketing images, experimenting with development processes, times, and chemicals, all to try and not make the same mistake twice (or maybe to replicate a beautiful mistake).

It is also a good habit to find a lab that you are able to build a relationship with, if you are unable to develop your own images. You may want there to be creative freedom in the process, and not all labs will be open to such printing techniques.

________________________________

The more involved you are with every moment of creating your final print, the more you will learn about the photographic process technically and artistically.

________________________________

6 — You learn to focus effectively and efficiently

If you have ever had to deal with a lens whose calibration was just SLIGHTLY off, you know how essential it can be to feel comfortable with focusing manually. Getting a film camera that requires you to train your eye to analyze a scene through the viewfinder and focus for yourself will train this muscle, and boy will it train it fast!

I was extremely nervous when I first started having to focus the lens myself. Many cameras have a center focal plane in the viewfinder that aids in focusing (the top half of the circle should line up/match the bottom half, and you have perfect focus). But your subject isn’t always centered! So you learn to rely on your eye far more than your equipment to get proper focusing.

Now, when shooting digital, having a subject that fall on or near one of my focus points is helpful, but not essential. If I have a subject that I want to put on the extreme edge of the frame (I love doing this, personally), I am able to tune my focusing in myself, confident that I will achieve a sharp subject using just my eyes.

7 — You learn to get as much right in camera as possible

The goal of most photographers is to eventually get everything right “in camera”. They want to become so proficient that their confidence boils over and they can spend their entire time working with the subject – whether landscapes, portraits, fine art, product, whatever their love is.

The single most effective way to learn to get your settings right, is to remove the power of digital manipulation and correction. Pull away the crutch of Lightroom, Photoshop, Capture One, or any other program you use, and suddenly you have no choice but to get better.

This final point is the culmination of the previous steps. Everything leads here. When you shoot film, what you are really saying is that you are so dedicated to the craft of photography (regardless of status of hobbyist, professional, or other) that you want to rely solely on yourself to get better. No digital manipulation, no highlight or shadow recovery sliders, no white balance adjustments after the fact.

__________________________________

You are saying “Photography is important, it matters to me, and I will be as skilled as I can be”.

__________________________________


About the Author

Michael Allen

Michael is a photographer and educator in the suburbs of Chicago. He does event photography - primarily weddings and concerts - but thrives on opportunities to pursue fine art in order to challenge and catalyze thought and conversation with the audience.

Comments

    1. Author

      Thank you! And I definitely agree that it can. I know plenty of photographers who aren’t lazy through digital, as well though. 🙂 Really at the end of the day we should just be challenging ourselves to look at our work critically – I feel film does that through the nature of what it is 🙂

      1. Yeah, born photographers can take a great image with anything. But with us average people, we need to learn the basics, and it isn’t really *necessary* to learn the basis when shooting digital.

        1. Author

          Thank you for the comments! 🙂

          I think it’s important to recognize that anyone can learn to shoot a great image with anything. It’s simply a culmination of creating comfort with the listed techniques, and some additional creative thinking. Creativity can be learned – by anyone. Some are simply more creative naturally, others are simply more okay with the idea of being “wrong” (which is really all being creative is at the end of the day, if you don’t mind a gross oversimplification), and others have to push themselves to reach their creativity.

  1. I learned photography the “old school” way (film; wet labs; etc.). I was slow to switch to Digital; resolution was my problem (film vs. Digital). When the resolution of digital started to rival film I made the switch. But I didn’t change my protocol (content; composition; exposure; focus). I have yet to experience a lazy way of taking a photograph; every frame is my best shot.

    1. Author

      That’s awesome! I’m so happy that I started photography in digital – I don’t know that I would have had the patience initially to learn the development process of film. But once I was comfortable with shooting and made the transfer to film, oh boy. My photos and my art as a whole just really started to improve. I feel like that’s because of how intentionally we treat each image when we’re shooting film.

  2. Your article immediately encouraged me to revisit 35mm film again. I just reacquainted myself with my Minolta Maxxum 700si (cost $660.00 in 1994), all 2.5 pounds of it. Yes, digital is very enjoyable for me, but it is just not the same. Many thanks for your article.

  3. Your article immediately encouraged me to revisit 35mm film again. I just reacquainted myself with my Minolta Maxxum 700si (cost $660.00 in 1994), all 2.5 pounds of it. Yes, digital is very enjoyable for me, but it is just not the same. Many thanks for your article.

    1. Author

      I’m so happy to hear that! I honestly wish I shot film more frequently, but it’s so hard to justify the time spent developing when I work a day job as well. Hopefully soon, I’ll be able to focus on shooting film again (when photography is full time) – I miss the improvement and the fun that comes from it!

  4. I have come do really despise the editing process. Monotony. Boring. Time I could spend with my family or other things. So almost all of these apply to my shooting digital. I want the image to be as close to perfect in my camera, and I really only want to sort through one.

    Good reminder of fundamentals.

    1. Author

      Absolutely, Bruce! It’s also important (I perhaps should have called it out in the article – maybe I’ll edit it to incorporate) to note that these are all things that are, as you suggest, possible to do with digital. It all comes down to intent when photographing. There are plenty of brilliant photographers out there who have never shot film a day in their lives (they don’t know what they’re missing out on though!). If our goal is to get as close to perfect initially, and if we are willing to engage with our final images and be honest about them to learn from them, we can learn from anything we shoot, even our phones!

  5. Just a note: the split screen focus aid is on the viewfinder ground glass, not the lenses.

Leave a Comment