Cheap Tripods vs. Professional Tripods: Does it Really Matter?


Behind a camera body and lens, a tripod may be the next most important piece of photography equipment you can buy.  Some would even argue that a tripod can improve your photography more than any other piece of gear.  That's debatable, as a flash could also fill that slot, but it really depends on the genre of photography that you primarily shoot.  For landscape photography, I believe a tripod is essential.  If astrophotography, or any other type of photography that uses longer exposure times, is your forte, then a tripod is mandatory for getting the shots.

This article isn't really about when or if you should use a tripod.  That is dependent upon your workflow and whether you feel that a tripod would be beneficial for improving your photography. Some people never use and/or just don't like using a tripod, and that is fine.  Rather, this article is for those who do use tripods, and especially for anyone who may be in the market for one.  It can be daunting looking at all the choices on the market.  Tripods come in so many sizes and at such a wide variety of price points.  Can there really be that much difference for something that just holds your camera while taking a shot?  Hopefully, this article will help to answer some of those burning questions.


Types of Tripods

There are several different types of tripods, each dependent upon the application for which they will be used.  The nomenclature may vary, but generally speaking, the various types include pocket tripods, tabletop tripods, travel tripods, full size or medium duty tripods, and studio tripods. Although each type specializes in a given application, there can be some crossover from one type to another.  The principles discussed in this article can mostly be applied to any of the tripod types.  However, to keep things simple and more consistent, this article will apply primarily to full size tripods.  This type of tripod is commonly the weapon of choice for landscape and nature photographers.


The Tripod Conundrum

A tripod really isn't a complicated piece of gear.  It has three legs connected at the top by some kind of central hub.  Those legs can generally be adjusted to various heights and can be composed of a variety of materials.  The objective of a tripod is simply to hold a camera and lens steady while capturing an image.  Sounds pretty straightforward.  In fact, you might think that any tripod would work just fine, as long as it will hold your camera and lens.  That may be true to some extent, but there is more to it than that.

You've probably heard the saying, “buy cheap, buy twice.”  Perhaps a better quote, credited to John Ruskin, is: “It's unwise to pay too much, but it's worse to pay too little.”  That basically means that you could purchase the cheap tripod, and it might work just fine, at least for a while. However, eventually you will find that the cheap tripod is lacking or may even become unusable.  Either out of necessity, desperation, or both, you will be forced to buy another tripod.  Thus begins the arduous decision-making process all over again.  Do you buy another cheap tripod, spend a little bit more for (hopefully) better quality, or go for the high dollar ticket item that you hope will be your last tripod purchase?  It's a predicament that's not made any easier by the seemingly endless selection of tripods to choose from.

Cheap vs. Inexpensive

My first tripod. Relatively inexpensive…and cheap.  Photo courtesy of Amazon.

“Cheap” and “inexpensive” are relative terms.  Even though it would seem that the two are interchangeable, they could actually have different meanings.  For instance, it is possible for something to be inexpensive without being cheap.  Conversely, something could also be cheap, but not necessarily inexpensive.  That sounds contradictory and confusing, but can be particularly applicable in the tripod conversation.

As alluded to before, tripods come in at such a wide range of price points.  You can get one for $50 or less or spend well over $1,000.  As with most things, the old adage “you get what you pay for” generally holds true, but maybe not always.  The $20 tripod you get at a Walmart or Best Buy is certainly inexpensive.  It's also cheap, as in very cheaply made.  The materials are low quality and it is not built well.  It might work fine for a few outings, or it could break the first time out in the field.  Someone may comment that they have one of these that has lasted for years, and that is great.  I would contend that that is the exception and not the rule.

There are also many tripods available that are relatively inexpensive, but are not cheaply made.  The build quality is much better and you are much more likely to get a few years of trouble-free use.  There are a few options from manufacturers like Manfrotto, Vanguard, and Induro that would fit into this category.  Check out the Improve Photography Recommended Gear Page or this article by Jim Harmer for some examples.  You'll have to pay a bit more than the department store tripod, but still won't have to empty out the bank account.

My first ever tripod was this one, purchased from Amazon a few years ago.  It is relatively inexpensive, although it didn't seem like it to me at the time.  There were tons of great reviews, but the build quality wasn't great, it was heavy, and it wasn't much fun to use.  There are certainly many better options that are in the same price range.


What Makes a Pro Tripod?

This is where things can get really tricky.  The word “professional”, when speaking of gear, can be very subjective.  The intent of this article is not to create controversy or debate about what makes a piece of gear professional or not.  These are my thoughts on the subject, based on research and personal experience.  I recently purchased my first professional quality tripod.  After having some time to use it, there are some obvious differences between it and the other tripods I have owned.

Build Quality

Professional quality tripods will have a decidedly better build quality than lower-end models.  They are constructed of much better materials and conform to higher quality assurance standards.  Although the most common build materials are carbon fiber or aluminum, most professional tripod legs will be constructed of carbon fiber.  Because of a higher strength to weight ratio, carbon fiber tripods are typically lighter than their aluminum counterparts.  Carbon fiber also has better vibration damping characteristics, which can be helpful for maximizing image sharpness. In short, you can feel the difference in build quality of a professional tripod.  It is much more stable, stiffer, and is constructed of much better components.


A higher-end tripod with top-notch build quality is simply going to be more reliable, especially over the long term.  While less expensive or cheap tripods may work fine for a while, they will likely have some kind of issue sooner or later.  With proper maintenance and care, a professional tripod should provide years of service.  I expect my new tripod to still be going strong at least 10, if not 20 years from now.  That means that I shouldn't have to buy new tripods along the way.

User Experience

This is a biggie and cannot be overstated.  I mentioned before that my first tripod wasn't really much fun to use.  A tripod that is not easy or fun to use is one that doesn't get used.  I found myself leaving that tripod behind more often than not, and trying to make do without it.  Some of my images probably suffered because of that.  A tripod that is better built and more reliable is most likely going to be more enjoyable to use.  That means you would be more likely to use it, which is a good thing.


Obviously, you shouldn't just use price to make the determination that something is professional quality.  However, you really do get what you pay for in most situations.  A superior quality product that is extremely reliable comes at a price.  If a tripod touted as “pro quality” at a low price sounds too good to be true, it probably is.  With that said, there is a wide price range for even tripods that would be considered professional quality.  These tripods may range from $400-$500 and on up.


So…Does it Really Matter?

There are many questions in photography that are invariably answered with “it depends”.  The answer to this question is not much different.  A professional landscape photographer, who is frequently out in the field and traveling the globe shooting in all weather conditions, should have a professional quality tripod.  They rely on their photography, and on that tripod to a great extent, to provide a paycheck.  The tripod they use has to perform and not be a hindrance to their work.

What about for the rest of us mere mortals; the weekend warriors who are passionate about our photography, but are primarily doing it as a hobby?  To be honest, I did make some nice images that I quite like with my very first tripod.  I just didn't want to use it because, quite frankly, it was a pain to work with.  A tripod, much like a camera and lens, is a tool.  It is used to possibly improve our images, and is an absolute necessity to create some images.  It should be user-friendly and perform flawlessly when you need it.  A tripod shouldn't get in the way of your photography.  If it does, then you are using the wrong tool.

For me personally, it does really matter.  I'm happy that I finally bit the bullet and purchased a pro-quality tripod.  It has been a joy to use and is truly a work of art compared to other tripods I have owned.  What's more, I have the peace of mind knowing that it will be ready to perform when I need it, for many years to come.  In my opinion, it would be best to skip all the iterations of cheap tripods that only last a short while.  Instead, save up and spend a little more for the best tripod you can afford.  You won't regret it, and you may even find that it's the best investment for your photography.


Final Note

I'm not trying to sell any particular tripod brand, but if you are interested to know which one I chose, check out the Youtube link below.  Admittedly, this is probably way more tripod than I'll ever need, but I decided to go for broke.  Literally!  There are certainly less expensive options that are also excellent choices.  By the way, I'll apologize in advance for the poor audio.

8 thoughts on “Cheap Tripods vs. Professional Tripods: Does it Really Matter?”

  1. Stephe Johnson

    Good article, thank you. Just one (humorous) note, I still use the same Bogen/Manfrotto tripod you have pictured here – but with a 3030 (pan/tilt) head. I guess it’s time for me to upgrade…

    1. I would say that it’s time to upgrade when either the tripod you have is not performing the way you need it to perform, or is broken. Until then, you may be just fine using what you have.

      Thanks for reading!

  2. For inexpensive tripods I think you have to prioritize what it is that you want and where you will compromise. Weight, ease of use, and / or durability. For instance I use a $120 ProAm tripod with an Induro Tripods BHL2S head. It is a rock solid performer and can support heavy equipment no sand bags required. It is easy to use and very stable. What do I lose? It’s like totting around a gallon of milk everywhere and I can’t shoot anything below a kneeling position.

  3. I have been looking for an article that will determine if an expensive tripod will hold a camera more still than a cheap one and why!
    this article doesn’t answer that, so can I assume that picture sharpness is no different between the two – if not what makes the difference. Forget all convenience, build, and time saving and let me know if my picture will look as sharp regardless of troublesome tripod set up. Does the surface a tripod is sitting on matter – grass, carpet, gravel, rubber, wood, rock – If I concrete the legs in to anchor the tripod will that matter! Turning off VR or IS seems to be recommended by many using tripods. Sharp pictures and still camera seem to go together so what is it about a tripod that holds the camera more still (cheap vs expensive)!
    Place camera on any tripod the way you said, turn off VR, lock up the mirror and use a remote shutter release! I never see anyone properly and inconveniently set up a cheap tripod against an expensive one and compare the pictures. Help me understand!

    1. @Edward Rhett – I haven’t done any head-to-head tests on how much the tripod actually makes a difference in the image quality, but I have owned well over a dozen tripods and shot with tripods all over the world.

      What I’d say is that the cheapest walmart or $50 Amazon tripods actually would impact image quality. In those tripods there is usually a noticeable wobble.

      Then you have your mid-grade tripods like your $100 Manfrotto, etc. These tripods will do a perfectly capable job of holding the camera steady. However, they likely won’t last you a career and they don’t have the fancy features of the expensive ones. Most photographers will be well served with a mid-grade tripod.

      Serious landscape photographers or other photographers who shoot on a tripod most of the time will probably enjoy an expensive tripod–not because the image quality is better, but because they are nicer to work with.

  4. There is also a huge amount of gear snobbery around tripods. Ask yourself what benefit chucking a grand at one is when you only paid five hundred for your dslr and kit lens. If you’re not using a Nikon 800mm then you won’t need that 800 smackeroo ball head that “only” weighs 3.5 pounds either.

    Remember too the impossible triangle of inexpensive/rigid/lightweight – you can have only two out of three: you can have inexpensive and lightweight but it won’t be rigid, etc. I bought inexpensive (ex-demo) and rigid so it ain’t light, but a decent tripod bag with shoulder strap made it reasonably portable.

    1. Right on, Tom. By the same token, I’m baffled when someone spends thousands on cameras and lenses, then doesn’t want to spend more than $50 for a tripod to hold them.

      To each their own, right? Thanks for reading!

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top