How I Fooled 316 Photographers

Rock star air guitar
This is the photo that I put on Facebook and held a contest to have people guess what shutter speed and aperture I used.

I know…it probably isn't unfair to title this article “How I fooled 316 photographers” but nobody would have clicked on it if I named the article “How nobody on Facebook correctly guessed the aperture and shutter speed of this photo even though it was really tricky.”

The background story

I was on a big shoot two weekends ago with multiple models and multiple assistants.  One of the models is a great dancer, so I decided to do some edgy portraits of her dancing around the studio.  Then, we decided to try something fun and make a shot of her like a rock star (the photo featured on this page).  So, we grabbed a few flashes, gelled them with various colors, and put them behind the model.  Since I short one flash (my fourth got knocked into the lake earlier this day), I had an assistant shine a cell phone on the front of the model for a little fill light (I know… totally low budget, right?).

The photos looked cool, but we needed something with more action, so  I asked the model to swing her hair around and rock an air guitar (probably not what she had in mind when we agreed on $20/hour for her modeling services).  Anyway, it made for a really fun shot.

When taking the shot, I used some NON-traditional camera settings just to prove a point.  As a teaching experience, I uploaded the shot on the Improve Photography Facebook Page and held a little contest to see what member of our community could guess the shutter speed and aperture.

316 photographers submitted guesses in the contest… but none of them were right.  In fact, none of them were even close.  Here is how I “fooled” all of them.

Young female dancer standing in the dance studio
Another photo from the same studio shoot. f/8, 1/200th, ISO 200. One small softbox directly above the camera and two bare flashes 5 feet behind and off to each side of the model on 3/4 power as rim lights.

The answer

During the shoot,  one of my assistants asked what shutter speed I was using to freeze the action of the model's hair.  I responded, “It doesn't matter!”  Obviously, a discussion ensued.  How could it not matter what shutter speed I was using?  The hair was moving very fast, so a slow shutter speed would ruin the shot, right?  Not at all.

In fact, (drum roll) the shutter speed I used on this photo was 1 second.  Yes, a full second.  The aperture was f/8 and the ISO was at 800.

How did you do that with a slow shutter speed?

The photo was taken in a studio with all of the room lights turned off.  Because it was completely black in the room, only the flashes illuminated the model.  A little-known fact about flashes is that they only light up for only a tiny fraction of a second.  The duration of a flash completely depends on the particular speedlight, but suffice it to say that it is VERY fast (around 1/1000th of a second).

So, if the scene is completely black during the exposure for only the instant that the flash emits its light, then it makes no difference what the shutter speed is.  It doesn't matter if the shutter speed is 1/200th of a second or 5 seconds.

In defense of all entrants in the contest…

Because the shutter speed doesn't matter, it was impossible to know the camera settings by just looking at the picture.  The most common guess sent in by readers was f/8 at 1/200th of a second.  The reason that most people guessed this is that f/8 is often the sharpest aperture and 1/200th of a second is a common flash sync speed.  If you are flash sync speed illiterate, check out this article that explains it in easy-to-understand terms.

HOWEVER, I would have given the prize to anyone who saw the trick and simply wrote in that the shutter speed didn't matter, or anyone who guessed a slow shutter speed.  Nobody did.  Not one person.  I gave the prize to the closest person, though.

18 thoughts on “How I Fooled 316 Photographers”

  1. Well, my guess was closer on shutter speed – I guess 1/15 of a second and f5.6. I only guessed f5.6 because I shoot on M4/3 cameras, with more diffraction issues, and therefore f5.6 is actually a sharper f-stop on most m4/3 lenses.

    1. @Chris Guillou – WHY the slow shutter speed? Absolutely no reason. The point here is that it makes no difference what shutter speed you use. It could be slow or fast with no difference.

  2. I guessed 1sec, although i didn’t have the apperture right I still think I got the shutter speed right as that was the Question wasn’t it? you might want to check my answer again on FB 🙂

  3. Well done. Was aware of the “shutter speed doesnt matter” when using flash, but havent tried it yet. Feeling more inspired to do it now lol.

    @Jason W. You focus on the subject before turning off the lights.

  4. When I read the first section, I studied the picture for a few minutes and tried to have a guess myself. I guessed f/8 at 1/200 sec. Haha!

    Great post, good point, and fun shots! Thanks for sharing.

  5. Can you give a bit more info on the shot itself? I assume the phone’s fill light was persistent but then the flashes behind her were triggered or painted in?

  6. I actually thought this was taken at a concert; good job. I think that’s how you managed to trick 316(+?) photographers – there’s still ambient light at a concert, so a shutter speed of one second would probably record more detail in the dark tones, especially at ISO800. More puzzles please!

    Ben @ EnglishPhotographer.com

  7. If I have saw the ‘contest’ I think I would have win because that is how I shoot.

    I shoot in clubs, and at very dark places. Often no more than ISO 400 and 1/3 sec. HEH!

  8. Hello! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing a few months of hard work due to no back up. Do you have any methods to prevent hackers?

  9. The trick is the pitch black room. No one could have known that. I think that some amount of ambient light was assumed by all! Love the challenge! It definitely is a great teaching tool. I think that cemented the fact that flash freezes the action and contributes greatly to the sharpness of the image. Thanks!

  10. Damonii Ayreborn

    I actually guessed, 6 seconds with a ND filter a flash to illuminate subject and 1.8 then some painting with torches from behind.

    Why did I guess this, Because literally last night I was practising the same effect to do portrait shots with Rembrandt lighting in any location regardless of the background (background becomes solid black)

  11. If it was pitch black, and it all makes sense with the flashes, the one part of the puzzle that doesn’t fit in is ‘assistant shine a cell phone on the front of the model for a little fill light’. Is there a way you were able to sync the cell phone light with the flashes that I’m not aware of or was it no really pitch black?

  12. I’m not really surprised no one got it right. If the room was in total darkness then why would you choose 1 second? In fact why choose anything below 1/100. It would be a totally random guess to think it was 1 sec much the same as selecting the lotto numbers.

    Also if the room was in total darkness then how did you see the model to know when to release the shutter and how did the model dance around without crashing into the walls. Perhaps there was low ambient light. If that is the case then choosing a 1 sec exposure at 800 iso would introduce a small amount of blur in a moving subject or perhaps it was to expose for the iPhone light.

    In the words of the immortal Spock….that is illogical captain.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top