Sony DSLR Review: How does Sony compare with Nikon and Canon?

Sony DSLR review

Today’s article is a review of Sony DSLR cameras.  Every time I mention differences between Canon and Nikon DSLRs, I get (often angry) emails from readers (almost assuredly Sony shooters), who want an explanation as to why I do not talk more about Sony DSLRs.  I don’t want to start an interstellar war over petty differences between camera manufacturers, but I do think that we photographers should be knowledgeable about the real differences between the camera systems so that we can make informed decisions about which brand will earn our hard earned money.

I want to mention up-front that I would LOVE to see Sony succeed in the DSLR market–if for nothing else than to put some fire under the seat of Nikon and Canon.  In my mind, competition is always a good thing.  I’m rooting hard for Sony, but as you’ll see below, there are some serious drawbacks to buying into the Sony system right now.

Benefits of Sony DSLR Cameras (Pros)

Pro #1: Autofocus for video

Many Sony DSLRs use what is called a “pellicle mirror” to show the image in the viewfinder.  In contrast to a traditional DSLR mirror that is opaque, the pellicle mirror allows most of the light to go to the sensor while using some of the light to produce the electronic viewfinder image.  This technology is new to popular DSLRs, but it has been used in cameras for years.

There are many advantages to using this technology in Sony DSLRs, and one of them is full-time autofocus for video.  It also means that the viewfinder doesn’t go dark when a picture is taken.  Unfortunately, it also means that some of the light that could be sent to the sensor is soaked up in the mirror.  You know what that means… worse low light performance.  Sony claims to overcome this limitation with advanced noise reduction, but it always makes me think how good the camera could be if it used all of the light.  Low light performance is the number one most important feature that I look for in a DSLR.

Customizable auto ISO

Pro#2: Customizable Auto ISO

I have been asking for this feature for years and I’m so glad to see that Sony has put this feature in the Sony a77 DSLR.  I love shooting in aperture priority mode whenever I can, but I have to keep watching my shutter speed so that it doesn’t dip too low for shooting in the evening when the light is fading fast.  Imagine if I could set my aperture and shutter speed, and then know that the ISO will automatically increase to allow for proper exposure up to a certain level where I know that the camera won’t produce too much noise.  Very useful for wildlife and sports photographers.

Pro #3: High frame rates

When you see the specs of Sony DSLRs, nothing will impress you more than the frame rates.  It is truly remarkable.  For example, the Sony a77 can capture 12 frames per second of 24 megapixel images.  While I certainly want to use that every day, it would be INCREDIBLE for shooting sports, wildlife, or kids.  I better stop writing about 12 frames per second before I can’t hold myself back from  It’s begging me to buy one just for the times when I neeeeeed that kind of speed.

Pro #4: Price

While the recent releases from Sony have not been overly price conscious, it has generally produced DSLRs that are slightly more affordable than their Canon and Nikon competitors.

Pro #5: GPS

Someone needs to send the message to Canon and Nikon that many or most of us would gladly pay $50 more to get GPS built into our DSLRs.  Sony has apparently understood that message and has been better about including it in their cameras than Canon and Nikon.

Pro #6: In-camera image stabilization

Whereas Canon and Nikon have placed the image stabilization/vibration reduction feature inside each lens, Sony puts the image stabilization mechanism in the camera itself.  While I have not seen any head-to-head comparisons of the two approaches to say which performs better, most people say that this is an advantage for Sony.  Having the mechanism in the camera means you do not have to pay to have the technology put in each and every lens, which is a nice feature.

Drawbacks to Sony DSLR Cameras (Cons)

You know the Marlboro man, now you meet the Sony Alpha DSLR man

Con #1: Proprietary… incredibly proprietary

One of the things about Sony that really bothers me is their reluctance to embrace open standards.  Canon and Nikon own so much of the market share that they can produce proprietary file formats and lens mounts and still know that there will be plenty of products available for their customers.  On the other hand, Sony is tremendously proprietary even though they are the small fish in the DSLR pond.

For many years, Sony created its own memory cards (Memory Stick brand) that were the only memory cards that would work in their cameras.  That means if you had a point-and-shoot from another company and switched to Sony, you’d have to buy a bunch of new Memory Sticks that were then useless when you switched brands.  Also, their Memory Sticks were usually more expensive.

Sony has continued their proprietary regime with file formats.  Their cameras shoot their own proprietary file format (like Canon and Nikon).  Unfortunately, they are smaller than Canon and Nikon, so when you get a new Sony DSLR, you may find yourself unable to edit the RAW files with popular digital image editing programs until the companies update the software, which can take quite a bit longer than the updates for Canon and Nikon.

That’s not it!  Sony has recently released the NEX line of cameras.  The 4/3 lens mount was an open standard followed by Panasonic and Olympus.  Did they follow the open standard so that we could use the lenses from one manufacturer on the camera of another?   No.  This divided the market and made things tougher for photographers.  They had an opportunity to follow the standard and chose not to.  Unfortunately, Nikon has chosen to follow their lead with a proprietary lens mount on the V1 and J1.

But there’s more!  At least Canon and Nikon have stuck with the same hotshoe mount for flashes.  Sony…. chose a different route.  Ugh!  That means the third party flashes like the YN-560 won’t work with the Sony unless you buy the special YN-560 Sony version.  That’s all fine and dandy, but it means that Sony users also don’t have access to the multiplicity of cheaper flash triggers and other flash goodies that their Nikon and Canon buddies can use.  If you’re interested in flash photography, this is a HUGE drawback in my opinion.

In short, Canon and Nikon are into the proprietary thing, but Sony is proprietary to the extreme.  This problem is compounded by the fact that they are a smaller market and so third party manufacturers are less apt to design for them.  This may not seem like a big deal until you’re ready to get into flash photography, and then you’ll hate yourself for buying into Sony’s walled garden.

Con #2: Dramatically reduced lens options

I know I’ll draw comments on this one because Sony shooters love their Zeiss and Zuiko lenses.  I’m NOT saying that Sony has no good glass available, but it would be absolutely impossible to argue that there is as much good glass available for Sony DSLRs as there is for Canon and Nikon cameras.  It’s simply not true.

Sony has worked quickly to make more lenses available, but it is still way behind the 8 ball.  Also, many of the “Sony” lenses are simply re-branded lenses from other manufacturers such as Tamron.

The lens selection is a major drawback to moving to the Sony system.

Con #3: Fewer resources available for learning

I have taught dozens of in-person photography workshops and have taught photography through this website to hundreds of thousands of people.  One thing I hear CONSTANTLY from people who purchase Sony DSLRs as their first camera is that they are frustrated that few learning resources are available to them.  Photography bloggers simply cannot write articles that only apply to the 5% of the audience who use Sony DSLRs.  It doesn’t make sense.

While there are some learning resources available, it is much easier to find content on using Canon and Nikon cameras.

Camera manufacturers are always bickering about who is better. Canon and Nikon against Sony... cage match!

Con #4: Fewer available accessories

As I mentioned previously in the section on how proprietary Sony is, it is difficult to buy accessories for Sony cameras.  If you want a battery grip for your Nikon D7000 or Canon 60D, it is simple to find one for $50 made by a third-party manufacturer on  If you shoot Sony, it is much more difficult.  In fact, even Sony doesn’t produce battery grips for all of its cameras.  Battery grips are only one example, but it can be a major headache.  If you want to get into flash photography, I would strongly suggest staying away from Sony.

Con #5: Electronic Viewfinders

This is a personal preference, but I just can’t stand electronic viewfinders.  I do not like that they never seem to show the highlights accurately, which is a big deal for landscape photographers especially.  The new AMOLED electronic viewfinders are a significant improvement, but they still don’t compare to the traditional prism and mirror schemes in DSLRs from Canon, Nikon, or any other manufacturer.

Con #6:  Unavailability of full-frame cameras

For photographers who wish to go full frame, you will find a dramatically reduced set of options.  Sony is coming out with another full frame camera in 2012 if all of the rumors are true, but the options are slim now.

So which should I buy?  Canon vs. Nikon vs. Sony?

Again, I am glad to see Sony innovating and producing great features on their cameras.  I sincerely hope that they continue to grow and eventually provide legitimate competition for Canon and Nikon.  Unfortunately, I cannot recommend Sony as a first DSLR to my readers.  There are simply too many drawbacks and I don’t see them overcoming the advantages in most situations.

If you like these photography tips from Improve Photography, you’ll also like our Facebook Fan Page.  It’s the PERFECT place to ask photography questions and get quick answers.


  1. paullubbock

    Good article. I don’t think anyone should ever switch their camera ecosystem whether it be Nikon, Canon or Sony based on current sensor technology reviews. Sensors will change with time, the newer usually the better assuming it is truly a next generation sensor and not just an update. Camera sensor technology will leapfrog one manufacturer to the next from time to time. Jumping ship every time it changes for greener pastures is foolish. Stick with your brand especially if you have good investment on good or high quality glass and it is a more open and affordable system. The glass is what is important. The glass is like a good CD-case. The program on the CD inside the case will become obsolete and worthless over time even if you paid a lot of money at one point. The case you can always use again and again.

  2. Brian

    Great Article! I began photography shooting with a Sony A230 about 4 years ago. Over those years I have bought a couple of lenses, external flashes and even studio lighting with radio triggers. Currently looking to upgrade my camera, I am personally tired of sony and looking to jump ship. Here are the reasons why, if you look at sony over the last 5 years, you will see that they cant make up there minds about why lens mount they want, first you have the A mount and now there is the E mount and it looks like sony is moving away from the A mount. All those sony photographers who bought A mount lenses through the years are not out of luck unless you want to spend another 100 dollars to have an accessory to convert to an E mount lens. Another issue is the hot shoe, lets not stick with the same hot shoe. Sony had its own version of hot shoe and now switches to what they call a standard hot shoe. Well its not quite a standard hot shoe because you can not just put on and 3rd party accessory on your camera. I think sony is pushing the market but they need to figure out what they are doing before changing everything on the camera every 3-5 years. That is why I think I am moving to Canon.

  3. Shiva

    Detailed article. I began photography with Sony Point – Shoot and quickly moved to Sony A580. I used it really well & frankly happy on how well it performs. Lately I have been thinking of upgrading the kit and think Sony is not really a good option for anyone who want to keep on upgrading/improving. I have tough time finding any their support staff, service centers, alternate accessories.
    Sony is really a good option for one time buy use lifetime but not for enthusiasts or amateurs.

  4. keith

    Almost 9 years (and 25 mostly Minolta lenses) later, I’m seriously considering leaving Sony, so much that I’m in the process of selling all my lenses. I just don’t like SLT as it relates to fast action shooting (as well as noise even at low ISOs). Some have said that they have gotten used to the “slide show” effect, but I would much rather have an OVF for this type of shooting. Panning while shooting with my A700 yields more keepers than the A77 (even at 12 fps). EVF can’t touch OVF for this type of shooting. Many of Sony’s “features” I consider them as gimmicks and didn’t use them. Useful for some, but still gimmicky. For example, focus peaking. Even on my A77 I never used it because I can look in the VF to see if focus is peaked with my naked eyes. Object Tracking – pretty much a useless gimmick. If Sony comes through by the end of summer this year with a greatly improved version of the A77, then I can reconsider and possibly re-buy into Sony. Otherwise, it’s hello Nikon.

  5. Dennis Horton

    I am a Sony user (A65v). I sold my Canon t3i after I realized that it did not have autofocus while shooting video. I have never looked back.
    This camera creates stunning images in most conditions. I love the autofocus, especially shooting video. The camera has some incredible ability and features, including the built-in Panorama mode. I have won local photo contests with this camera.
    The biggest thing that I absolutely HATE about Sony is their attitude and lack of customer service. When shopping for accessories for this camera, I was warned about third party offerings. They, apparently, don’t work well. So, when it comes to shopping for accessories I turned to a couple of camera stores here in Denver. They want to sell you the camera, but don’t want to stock the needed accessories to go with it. Sony has closed the Sony store in Denver (and most other locations) so spur of the moment accessory purchases are out of the question. Sony’s online store is hit or miss for availability. By far, ebay has been my most reliable supplier (even from China or Hong Kong). The worst part about this is: SONY DOESN’T CARE!
    In my opinion, Sony is leading the way in innovation, but is in far last place when it comes to dealing with customers. Sony, get your head out of your ass.

  6. mayukh mukherjee

    hello sir,
    i currently own a sony alpha entry level dslt..its my 1st interchangeable lens camera…i bought inorder to learn photograhy..before going to the store i had nikon d3300 in mind..but after seeing the technology sony has put in,i considered it would help me learn as i am new to this completely..i did a lot of study on photography and as i surf through websites i doubt on my product seeing all pros suggesting the top two..did i do wrong to choose sony over the visible cam giants ie nikon and canon?i am completely satisfied with my product but will it hinder my lessons?should i sell nd buy nikon or canon?

Leave a Comment