Gary Fong Lightsphere vs. Tupperware
This page is an in-depth explanation of one of the myths in my article “12 Myths that Every Photographer Should Know.”
The Basics of On-Camera Flash
The softness of light produced by a flash is controlled by the size of the light source. The larger the light source is, the softer the light. This is why you see photographers shooting a flash through an umbrella. The umbrella spreads out the light and produces a softer quality of light on the model. There are times when umbrellas, softboxes, and the like are too cumbersome. For example, when shooting a wedding reception I generally keep the flash mounted on the camera so I can get some quick shots moving around the event. However, the light produced by the raw flash pointing directly at the subject is too hard. The light quality is terrible! One solution to this problem is to bounce the light off the ceiling so the ceiling spreads out the light and then reflects down on the person. Unfortunately, this magic technique does not work in every situation. Suppose the wedding reception is outside–where could you bounce the light off now? Or suppose the wedding reception is in a room so large that the ceiling is too far away to bounce the flash off. In these situations, most photographers turn to commercial on-camera flash diffusers such as the Gary Fong Lightsphere or the Adorama Mini Softbox. These miniature flash diffusers slightly enlarge the size of the flash and diffuse the light.
What is the Gary Fong Lightsphere?
The Gary Fong Lightsphere is a collapsible piece of ribbed and frosted rubber that fits snuggly on top of an on-camera flash and diffuses the light of the bare flash so that it falls more evenly and softly on the model. The product does reasonably well for what it is. It does in fact diffuse the light and produces reasonably pleasing light on the model considering that the picture is taken with on-camera flash.
Why in the world are you comparing this product to tupperware?!?!
The Gary Fong Lightsphere costs $50. For a hunk of rubber that produces only marginal improvements over the on-camera flash in my opinion, that is just way too much money. The fact is that the darn thing looks like a piece of tupperware to me. So, I got curious. Was this product doing anything that any other hunk of plastic couldn’t do? I tested my hypothesis by taking several pictures with a few different pieces of tupperware to see if I had completely wasted my money on this expensive piece of tupperware called the Lightsphere.

I personally prefer the light from the tupperware and the Lightsphere over the flash bounced off the ceiling. The direct flash is just nasty looking.
So which one produced the better lighting? The tupperware or the Lightsphere?
After my testing, I found that there was absolutely no difference in my opinion in the quality of the light produced by the tupperware in comparison to the quality of light produced by the Lightsphere. In short, save your money. I understand that photographers might be tempted to buy the Lightsphere just because it looks more professional than Tupperware, but have you looked at the Lightsphere? It looks like a UFO landed on your flash! If you still aren’t convinced about the tupperware, then you might consider a much cheaper option for on-camera flash such as the Opteka Mini Softbox or even a DIY option.
Further Reading:
- How to Make a Simple Flash Diffuser for FREE!
- Orbis Ring Flash Review
- 12 Myths Every Photographer Should Know
- What $14.21 Can Do for Your Flash Photography (DIY Flash Diffuser)


November 2, 2011 


I want to buy a lightsphere made by Gary Fong, could you please tell me how and where that I can buy one for me living in Hong Kong.
Thank you in advance for your kind response.
I’m strictly an amateur but do end up taking candid shots for people at weddings.
I’ve been using the Gary Fong for years and for the most part am pleased with the results.
The one thing that I find frustrating about the Gary Fong is the amount of light it eats. I seldom see anyone talking about this factor. I’ve searched and can’t really find any clear information on the light output reduction.
I use a Canon 580EX speedlight usually with my 5D. I’ve noticed that I often end up underexposing at group events so did a little rooky testing to see where the actual limits were.
I used manual settings for both the flash and camera.
My results at ASA 320 (shutter speed at 100 but not relevant because little ambient light) where:
10 feet f4
8 feet f5.6
6 feet f8
I’ll often take a picture (quickly posed) of a group of about 8 to 10 people. For this type of picture I like to be about 10 feet away because it seems to make people less self conscious. Because they are never arranged on a parallel plane I like to shoot at about f8. This will of course lead to underexposure.
I’ve concluded that I need to stay within about 8 feet and live with f5.6 or so.
I would find it very interesting to see some sort of comparison between different diffusers with respect to light loss.
Please help genuine Photographers who are trying to help the industry by inventing something that works.
I’ve said that least 2387903 times. SCK was here
Nice blog here! Also your website loads up very fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my site loaded up as fast as yours lol
If you’re not an excellent author then it may possibly be very best not to try and write your tales oneself. You’ll want to bring in support to complete them for you personally to ensure that you just receive all of the facts you would like put across and you don’t be or perhaps your corporation look bad.
If men and women connect with yourself on an individual level, they may be much more prone to wish to contemplate your organization.
Thanks for the recommendations you have discussed here. Yet another thing I would like to talk about is that laptop memory requirements generally go up along with other innovations in the know-how. For instance, if new generations of processor chips are made in the market, there’s usually a matching increase in the shape calls for of all personal computer memory along with hard drive space. This is because the software program operated simply by these cpus will inevitably boost in power to make use of the new know-how.
You have numerous positive points there. I made a explore the matter and located nearly all peoples will trust your site.
我愛塔羅牌,你也塔羅牌全世界都塔羅牌了起來塔羅牌
Which piece of Tupperware worked well?
Great tip! Can’t wait to share this with my followers. Who knew tupperware had so many clever uses
All the heavy lifting is happening in the ceiling bounce with a tiny bit of fill in the fong/tupper shots. The small amount of fill introduced by the devices is subtle, but could be the difference between a good shot and really good shot. I don’t think it will ever make or break any photo.
Second, I have to laugh at all the “pros” who say that coming in with a Gary Fong makes them look pro. What a joke. Get over it. You are in denial. It looks looks like you have tupperware on your flash! You don’t look professional because of the Gary Fong.
When using the lighsphere collapsable did you have the cloud dome in place? I have a Lightsphere Universal Cloud and an Lightsphere II Cloud and the images always look better when I don’t use the cloud dome when firing straight up. Seriously keep the lid off.
Great info. Lucky me I came across your site by accident (stumbleupon). I have saved it for later!%7